After this process, you will end up with \(\frac{1}{2}k^2 + \frac{3}{2}k + 1\) matrices
Step 3
Consider the matrices \(\{S_\sigma\}\). Each of these matrices corresponds to a \(2+k\)-dimensional shape (the fundamental parallelepiped\(\Pi \left ( S_\sigma\right )\) defined by the columns of that matrix).
The fundamental parallelepiped \(\Pi(S_\sigma)\)
Note that
\[\Pi \left ( S_\sigma\right ) = \{S_\sigma \cdot (x_1, \dots, x_{k+2})'\}\] Think of the \(x_i\) as representing the interval \([0,1]\), so that you are getting a shape. In other words, \(\Pi\) is the Minkowski sum of the columns of \(S_\sigma\).
For each \(\sigma\), want to visualize a collection of parallelepipeds, \(\Pi \left ( S_\sigma\right ) + Mz\), where \(z \in \mathbb{Z}^{k+2}\). (FIXME: in practice we won’t want to generate individual plots because there will be too many, we just want to emphasize a given \(S_\sigma\) in the plots discussed next.)
The desired end product is to create two visualizations: one of all positive \(S_\sigma\) and one of all negative \(S_\sigma\).
What about \(det(S_\sigma) = 0\)?
The determinant measures volume. So, in this case, the volume of the parallelepiped is 0, so there is nothing to visualize.